Why Claude rewards structured transcripts more than other models
Claude's Constitutional AI training rewards faithful citation. Give it a flat-text transcript and it will hedge ("someone in the meeting mentioned…") because it can't verify who said what. Give it a Markdown transcript with explicit speaker headings and it will quote directly and attribute precisely ("at 00:24:15, Marcus said…"). The behaviour change is visible from the first prompt.
On Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7, the gap widens further on multi-hour transcripts: structured Markdown lets Claude maintain speaker continuity across the full document, while flat text loses attribution after roughly 30 minutes of conversation.
The Claude Projects workflow for recurring meetings
Convert each meeting recording once on Audio to Markdown, save the .md file with a date-prefixed name (2026-01-15-product-sync.md), and drop it into a Claude Project's knowledge base. Every conversation in that Project starts with the full meeting history available — ask "what has this team decided about pricing across all our meetings this quarter" and Claude can cross-reference dates, speakers, and decisions in one answer.
Pair with PDF and URL sources for a complete knowledge base: convert vendor PDFs (PDF to Markdown for Claude) and reference web pages (URL to Markdown for Claude) into the same Project.