Pricing Dashboard Sign up
Recent

Audio to Markdown for Support — Call Transcripts

Customer support calls are a goldmine for QA, training, and product feedback — and almost none of it gets used because nobody listens back to recorded calls. Upload support call recordings to mdisbetter.com and get structured Markdown transcripts: agent / customer labelled, topics as H2 sections, timestamps for verification. Use the transcripts for QA review, distill them into training material, document them for compliance and dispute resolution. NOT integrated with Zendesk / Talkdesk / Intercom — manual upload workflow only.

Why this is hard without the right tool

  • Support calls need to be documented for quality
  • QA review requires accessible transcripts
  • Training material from real customer calls
  • Compliance and dispute resolution needs

Recommended workflow

  1. Record customer support calls via your call-centre platform (Talkdesk, Aircall, Five9, Zendesk Talk, etc.) — make sure consent disclosure is configured correctly per your jurisdiction
  2. Download recordings of calls flagged for QA review or training extraction
  3. Upload each recording to /convert/audio-to-markdown
  4. Download the structured Markdown — agent / customer labelled, topics as H2 sections, timestamps inline
  5. For QA review: managers read the transcript faster than re-listening, scoring against your QA rubric
  6. For training: distill the best handling examples into anonymised training documents (paste into ChatGPT/Claude with "convert to a training scenario, anonymise customer details")
  7. For dispute resolution: archive the transcript alongside the original audio in your case management system

Be clear: not a call-centre platform integration

Tools like Observe.AI, Calabrio, and NICE integrate with call-centre platforms (Talkdesk, Five9, Genesys, Zendesk Talk) to capture calls automatically, run AI QA scoring, identify trending issues across the team, and provide real-time agent assist. mdisbetter does NONE of that. We are a manual upload tool — you download recordings from your platform, upload them to mdisbetter individually, paste relevant excerpts into your ticketing system or QA workflow manually.

Where mdisbetter fits in support operations

Small support teams (1-10 agents) without budget for enterprise QA platforms. Spot-check QA reviews where managers manually pull a sample of calls to review per week. Training material extraction — finding the 5-10 best handled calls per quarter and distilling them into training scenarios. Dispute resolution — when a customer complaint requires reconstructing what was said in a specific call, the transcript is faster than the audio. Compliance documentation when retention requirements demand both audio and transcript.

QA review workflow that scales (a bit)

Managers read transcripts much faster than they listen to calls — typically 5-10x faster. A 30-minute call read as transcript takes 3-6 minutes; listening takes 30. For a manager doing 10 QA reviews per week, the transcript workflow is the difference between "1 hour of focused work" and "5 hours of distracted listening". The QA scoring itself still requires human judgment against your rubric — mdisbetter is the speed-up on the input phase, not an automated QA scoring tool (those are Observe.AI / Calabrio jobs).

Training material extraction

The best training material is real handled-well customer calls, anonymised. Workflow: identify a great call (agent demonstrates excellent product knowledge, de-escalation, problem-solving), upload to mdisbetter, paste the Markdown into Claude/ChatGPT with "convert this to an anonymised training scenario — change customer name to Customer A, remove account numbers, preserve the agent's technique and the customer's emotional arc". Result: a teaching artefact your new hires read instead of guessing what good looks like.

Two-party consent and recording disclosure

Customer-facing call recording requires consent disclosure under most jurisdictions' rules (the standard "this call may be recorded for quality and training purposes" notice). Your call-centre platform handles the disclosure mechanism; verify it's configured correctly. mdisbetter just transcribes the audio you upload — the lawful-recording and consent question is upstream of us.

For high-volume automated QA

If you need automated QA scoring across 100% of calls, real-time agent assist, trending-issue identification across the team, and integrated coaching workflows — use the dedicated platforms: Observe.AI, Calabrio ONE, NICE Enlighten. Their per-agent pricing reflects the depth. mdisbetter is the cheap manual workflow for teams that need transcripts but not the full automation layer.

Frequently asked questions

Does mdisbetter integrate with Zendesk / Talkdesk / Intercom?
No. mdisbetter has zero call-centre platform integrations. You download recordings from your platform manually, upload to mdisbetter individually, paste relevant excerpts into your ticketing system manually. For automated workflow with call-centre platforms, use <a href="https://www.observe.ai/">Observe.AI</a>, <a href="https://www.calabrio.com/">Calabrio</a>, or <a href="https://www.nice.com/">NICE Enlighten</a> — they integrate with major contact-centre stacks and provide automated QA scoring, real-time agent assist, and trending analysis. mdisbetter is the manual alternative for smaller teams.
How does this help with QA review?
Managers read transcripts 5-10x faster than they listen to calls. A 30-minute call read as Markdown takes 3-6 minutes; listening takes 30 minutes. For a QA reviewer doing 10 calls per week, the transcript workflow saves several hours of focused time per week. The scoring itself still requires human judgment against your rubric — mdisbetter speeds up the input phase, not the evaluation phase. For automated QA scoring across 100% of calls, you need a dedicated platform.
Can I extract training material from real customer calls?
Yes — workflow is: find a call where the agent handled something exceptionally well, upload to mdisbetter, paste the Markdown into Claude/ChatGPT with "convert to an anonymised training scenario — change customer name to Customer A, remove account numbers, preserve the agent's technique and the customer's emotional arc". The output is a teaching artefact your new hires can read instead of guessing what good looks like. Building a library of 20-30 of these is a multi-month project, manageable per-call.
What about consent and recording disclosure?
Customer-facing call recording requires consent disclosure under most jurisdictions' rules (the standard "this call may be recorded for quality and training purposes" notice). Your call-centre platform handles the disclosure; verify it's configured correctly. mdisbetter just transcribes audio you upload — the lawful-recording and consent question is upstream of us. Don't upload recordings made without proper consent disclosure.
Is this appropriate for sensitive customer data (financial, health)?
Depends on your industry compliance requirements. For PCI-scope financial data, HIPAA-protected health data, or material under similar strict regulatory frameworks, mdisbetter's standard web tool may not be appropriate (no PCI / HIPAA-tier infrastructure, no BAAs). For those use cases, use enterprise platforms with appropriate compliance contracts (Observe.AI Enterprise, Calabrio for regulated industries) or run <a href="https://github.com/openai/whisper">whisper</a> locally on compliant infrastructure. For general customer support transcription without strict regulatory requirements, mdisbetter is appropriate.

Try the tool free →